Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
Identifieur interne : 001591 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001590; suivant : 001592Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
Auteurs : Aron Ascher ; Gunnar E. Carlsson ; Mats KronströmSource :
- Swedish dental journal [ 0347-9994 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Appareils de prothèse dentaire (), Appareils de prothèse dentaire (utilisation), Attitude du personnel soignant, Besoins et demandes de services de santé (), Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier (), Dentistes (psychologie), Humains, Implants dentaires (), Implants dentaires (utilisation), Mandibule (), Mandibule (anatomopathologie), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Overdenture (), Overdenture (utilisation), Overdenture (économie), Prosthodontie (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (utilisation), Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation), Satisfaction du patient, Suède, Économies.
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Mandibule.
- psychologie : Dentistes.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- utilisation : Appareils de prothèse dentaire, Implants dentaires, Overdenture, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée.
- économie : Overdenture, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire.
- Appareils de prothèse dentaire, Attitude du personnel soignant, Besoins et demandes de services de santé, Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée, Overdenture, Prosthodontie, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Satisfaction du patient, Suède, Économies.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Suède.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cost Savings, Dental Implant-Abutment Design (statistics & numerical data), Dental Implants (statistics & numerical data), Dental Implants (utilization), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (utilization), Dentists (psychology), Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture, Overlay (economics), Denture, Overlay (statistics & numerical data), Denture, Overlay (utilization), Dentures (statistics & numerical data), Dentures (utilization), Health Services Needs and Demand (statistics & numerical data), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (pathology), Mandible (surgery), Patient Satisfaction, Prosthodontics (statistics & numerical data), Sweden.
- MESH :
- chemical , statistics & numerical data : Dental Implants.
- geographic : Sweden.
- economics : Denture, Overlay.
- instrumentation : Denture Retention.
- pathology : Mandible.
- psychology : Dentists.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Dentures, Health Services Needs and Demand, Prosthodontics.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- chemical , utilization : Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Dentures.
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Cost Savings, Humans, Patient Satisfaction.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the production of mandibular implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses among prosthodontic specialists in Sweden and to compare the results with findings in a similar study made in 2001 (17). Questionnaires regarding treatment with mandibular implant prostheses during 20011 were mailed to all specialists in prosthodontics in Sweden (n = 156, according to available data). Of the 156 questionnaires, 129 (83%) were returned and of those 114 were completed. The reported number of treatments with mandibular implant-supported prostheses varied much among the specialists. Fixed implant prostheses were more common than overdentures (means 11 and 3, median values 8 and 2, respectively). However, the range was large for both alternatives. Ten (9%) of the specialists reported no treatment with fixed implant prostheses while 29 (25%) had not made any implant overdenture during 2011. The most common anchorage system for overdentures in 2011 (as well as in 2001) was two un-splinted implants with ball attachments or Locator abutments. The most common reasons for choosing overdenture treatment instead of a fixed implant prosthesis in 2011 were the reduced cost and the patient's main wish to improve denture retention. A majority of the prosthodontists (58%) reported that patients with implant overdentures were as satisfied as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas 40% claimed they were less satisfied. Two respondents (2%) considered that overdenture patients were more satisfied than those with a fixed prosthesis. It can be concluded that the general attitude among Swedish prosthodontists towards implant overdentures has not changed much during the 10-year period between the present and the previous investigation.An overdenture is still a seldom-used option in implant treatment of patients with edentulous mandibles in Sweden. Instead, a fixed implant-supported prosthesis continues to be the preferred option,
PubMed: 25771650
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000A49
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000A49
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000A49
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 005946
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 005946
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 005946
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001594
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001591
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.</title><author><name sortKey="Ascher, Aron" sort="Ascher, Aron" uniqKey="Ascher A" first="Aron" last="Ascher">Aron Ascher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E" last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25771650</idno><idno type="pmid">25771650</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">005946</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">005946</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">005946</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0347-9994:2014:Ascher A:use:of:implant</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001594</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001591</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001591</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.</title><author><name sortKey="Ascher, Aron" sort="Ascher, Aron" uniqKey="Ascher A" first="Aron" last="Ascher">Aron Ascher</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E" last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Swedish dental journal</title><idno type="ISSN">0347-9994</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Cost Savings</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Implants (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Implants (utilization)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (utilization)</term><term>Dentists (psychology)</term><term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (economics)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Denture, Overlay (utilization)</term><term>Dentures (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dentures (utilization)</term><term>Health Services Needs and Demand (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Prosthodontics (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Sweden</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire ()</term><term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire (utilisation)</term><term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term><term>Besoins et demandes de services de santé ()</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier ()</term><term>Dentistes (psychologie)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires ()</term><term>Implants dentaires (utilisation)</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Overdenture ()</term><term>Overdenture (utilisation)</term><term>Overdenture (économie)</term><term>Prosthodontie ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (utilisation)</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation)</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Suède</term><term>Économies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Sweden</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture, Overlay</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Dentistes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentists</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Dentures</term><term>Health Services Needs and Demand</term><term>Prosthodontics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="utilisation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="utilization" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Dentures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Overdenture</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Cost Savings</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Appareils de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term><term>Besoins et demandes de services de santé</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prosthodontie</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Suède</term><term>Économies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Suède</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to investigate the production of mandibular implant-supported fixed and removable prostheses among prosthodontic specialists in Sweden and to compare the results with findings in a similar study made in 2001 (17). Questionnaires regarding treatment with mandibular implant prostheses during 20011 were mailed to all specialists in prosthodontics in Sweden (n = 156, according to available data). Of the 156 questionnaires, 129 (83%) were returned and of those 114 were completed. The reported number of treatments with mandibular implant-supported prostheses varied much among the specialists. Fixed implant prostheses were more common than overdentures (means 11 and 3, median values 8 and 2, respectively). However, the range was large for both alternatives. Ten (9%) of the specialists reported no treatment with fixed implant prostheses while 29 (25%) had not made any implant overdenture during 2011. The most common anchorage system for overdentures in 2011 (as well as in 2001) was two un-splinted implants with ball attachments or Locator abutments. The most common reasons for choosing overdenture treatment instead of a fixed implant prosthesis in 2011 were the reduced cost and the patient's main wish to improve denture retention. A majority of the prosthodontists (58%) reported that patients with implant overdentures were as satisfied as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas 40% claimed they were less satisfied. Two respondents (2%) considered that overdenture patients were more satisfied than those with a fixed prosthesis. It can be concluded that the general attitude among Swedish prosthodontists towards implant overdentures has not changed much during the 10-year period between the present and the previous investigation.An overdenture is still a seldom-used option in implant treatment of patients with edentulous mandibles in Sweden. Instead, a fixed implant-supported prosthesis continues to be the preferred option,</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Ascher, Aron" sort="Ascher, Aron" uniqKey="Ascher A" first="Aron" last="Ascher">Aron Ascher</name><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E" last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001591 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001591 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25771650
|texte= Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25771650" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |